dc.description.abstract |
The industrial effluents contain substantial amounts of toxic heavy metal ions which pollutes
surface water and groundwater. In this study, the adsorptive removal of copper, iron and
nickel ions from wastewater using Makoro Granite brick waste (MGBW), Makoro Gold Satin
(MGS) clay brick waste, copper smelter slag (CSS) and cement brick waste (CBW) as novel
adsorbents has been investigated at batch mode. The mineralogical and chemical content of
adsorbents was determined using X-ray Diffractometer (XRD) and X-ray Fluorescence
(XRF) respectively. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) on both adsorbents prior to and after
adsorption was done. Surface morphology of media and pH point of zero charge (pH pzc)
were respectively investigated and determined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
and pH drift method. The leaching behaviour of media was investigated at different contact
times; 24, 48 and 72 hours. The batch investigations focused on the effects of contact time,
pH of solution, adsorbent dosage or loading, temperature, and adsorbent size to determine the
effectiveness of the media. XRD revealed amorphous and crystalline phases on both media
without noticeable changes before and after adsorption. The pH pzc of CBW, MGBW, MGS
and CSS were found to be 6.45, 8.3, 6.25 and 7.01 respectively. SEM revealed presence of
micro-pores and irregular distribution of clumps on both media. Leaching test revealed that
CSS leached more of copper, iron and nickel after 48 and 72 hours exceeding consent values
for environmental discharge. Only iron exceeded consent values on MGS leachate after 48
hours while the other media had leaching concentrations not exceeding permissible values.
The maximum adsorption capacities of copper smelter slag were 3.3 mg g-1 media, 3.1, mg g-1
media and 3.2 mgg-1 media for the removal of iron, copper and nickel ions respectively after
30 minutes. In the case of MGBW, the optimal capacities were 7.6 mg g-1 media, 6.7 mg g-1
media and 6.2 mg g-1 media respectively, for iron, copper and nickel removal after 45
minutes. However, maximum adsorption capacities for MGS were found to be 6.7, 6.1 and
4.5 mgg-1 media respectively for copper, iron and nickel after 45 minutes. As for CBW
maximum adsorption capacities were 8.5, 8.7 and 4.2 mgg-1 media for copper, iron and nickel
respectively after 45 minutes. Both Pseudo First and Pseudo Second Order models described
the adsorption process. Intra-particle and mass transfer diffusion were both rate controlling
the reactions. Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models were involved in adsorption process
indicating that adsorption of some metals was taking place in some heterogeneous and
homogenous active sites. Thermodynamic parameters for CSS, MGS, CBW and MGBW
indicated that the adsorption process was non spontaneous process and was exothermic.
Reusability or regeneration studies on MGBW, MGS, CBW and CSS verified that CBW
lowered its original capacity in three regeneration cycles using 0.1 M Sodium Hydroxide.
Based on performance of media two media, CBW and MGBW were selected for column
studies. Column results revealed that, nickel was leaching from MGBW and less removed
due to large ionic radius and high electronegativity compared to other metals. However,
CBW column results indicated better adsorptive removal of target metal ions. Thomas
column kinetic model described the mechanism for adsorptive removal of divalent copper,
iron and nickel better in the fixed bed column study and it agreed with the some batch models
as the Thomas model predicts that the adsorption process follows Langmuir isotherm model
and was derived based on the second order kinetics. Overall, MGBW and CBW can be
applied as low cost, effective and environmentally friendly adsorbents for the adsorptive
removal of copper, iron and nickel irons from wastewater. However, CSS and MGS can also
be used for separation of heavy metals from wastewater provided they are modified. However
further studies on MGS and CSS through fixed bed column process should be investigated
before field trials. It is also however important that further studies should be done using real
wastewater before field trials. |
en_US |