BIUSTRE

Image compression techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey and comparison

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lungisani, Bose A.
dc.contributor.author Lebekwe, Caspar K.
dc.contributor.author Zungeru, Adamu Murtala
dc.contributor.author Yahya, Abid
dc.date.accessioned 2022-10-20T08:35:24Z
dc.date.available 2022-10-20T08:35:24Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08-10
dc.identifier.citation Lungisani, B.A. et al, (2022) Image compression techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey and comparison. IEEE Access, 10, 82511 - 82530. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3195891. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2169-3536
dc.identifier.uri http://repository.biust.ac.bw/handle/123456789/495
dc.description Survey en_US
dc.description.abstract There is continuous intensive research on image compression techniques in wireless sensor networks (WSNs) in the literature. Some of the image compression techniques in WSNs that exist in the literature include discrete cosine transform (DCT), discrete waveform transforms (DWT), set partitioning in a hierarchical tree (SPIHT), and embedded zero tree wavelet (EZW) coding. Research on image compression in WSNs is necessitated by the need to improve the energy efficiency of sensor nodes and WSNs’ lifetimes without compromising the quality of the reconstructed data. Several approaches have been developed centered around image compression and other factors in trying to limit the energy consumption of sensor nodes. Most of these approaches do not provide the error-bound mechanism that balances the rate of compression and distortion of the reconstructed image. Therefore, in this paper, a review and analysis of image compression techniques and approaches in WSNs are conducted. Available image compression approaches in WSNs in literature were then classified according to the image compression technique adopted, and their strengths and weaknesses were highlighted. In addition, a rate-distortion balanced data compression algorithm with error bound mechanism based on artificial neural networks (ANN) in the form of an autoencoder (AE) was coded and simulated in MATLAB before being evaluated and compared to the conventional approaches. The experimental results show that the simulated algorithm has less root mean square error (RMSE) and a higher coefficient of determination ( $R^{2}$ ) values on variable compression ratios as compared to the Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Discrete Cosine Transform, and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) when using the Grand-St-Bernard metrological dataset. Furthermore, it presented less RMSE, and higher compression ratio values compared to the Lightweight Temporal Compression (LTC) algorithm on variable error bounds when using the LUCE metrological dataset. Therefore, it was found that the simulated algorithm presents better compression fidelity as compared to the conventional approaches without an error-bound mechanism. Moreover, the algorithm analyzed presents a significant approach to balancing the compression ratio and reconstructed data quality through its error-bound mechanism. en_US
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the Office of Research, Development and Innovation (ORDI) of the Botswana International University of Science and Technology under Grant S00174. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) en_US
dc.subject Autoencoder en_US
dc.subject Data compression en_US
dc.subject Image compression en_US
dc.subject Image compression techniques en_US
dc.subject Lossy compression en_US
dc.subject Wireless sensor network(s) en_US
dc.title Image compression techniques in wireless sensor networks: a survey and comparison en_US
dc.description.level phd en_US
dc.description.accessibility unrestricted en_US
dc.description.department cte en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search BIUSTRE


Browse

My Account